?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Eric

Recompense

Posted on 2008.04.16 at 09:30

Comments:


Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2008-04-18 14:10 (UTC) (Link)
Don't sidestep the questions. Be bold. Be brave. Answer what you have been asked!
ehowton
ehowton at 2008-04-18 14:56 (UTC) (Link)
Hey retard! Guess what? Your question uses so many double-negatives, splashed with a healthy side of angst and a double-helping of emo that I CANNOT COMPREHEND WHAT QUESTION YOU ARE TRYING TO ASK.

I've mentioned this twice now.
Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2008-04-18 15:22 (UTC) (Link)
and I have clarified the question for you sir, and you still pretend to be dense. There are no double negatives or emo anything involved in the clarification.

I am prepared to wait for my answer until Hell freezes over, if that's what it takes.
ehowton
ehowton at 2008-04-18 16:08 (UTC) (Link)
Listen here you little fuckstick, I wouldn't dare dream of answering a question about a movie I never saw from a 'clarified' question of:

...just like the constant bickering in When Harry Met Sally led to a happy conclusion, why do you think this situation will not?

What do I think this situation will not?

WHAT DO I THINK THIS SITUATION WILL NOT?

There could cause proper usage. As to make clarity meaning. Wot tenses? Intransitive verb are hards.
Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2008-04-18 16:38 (UTC) (Link)
Learn to read the fucking English language and understand analogies.

When Harry Met Sally ended with a happy conclusion despite the constant bickering. You, however, have expressed the opinion that the sitation between melancthe and I will not. Justify your answer.
ehowton
ehowton at 2008-04-18 16:58 (UTC) (Link)
Learn to read the fucking English language...
Learn to read the fucking English language. I'll say it again, more slowly this time: I NEVER SAW THE FUCKING MOVIE.

You, however, have expressed the opinion...
Where? Where did I express this opinion?
Melancthe the Woe, So-Called
melancthe at 2008-04-18 17:40 (UTC) (Link)
In order to make this clearer for all concerned, perhaps you could define what you'd consider to be "a happy conclusion"?
Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2008-04-18 19:20 (UTC) (Link)
What kind of a peace do we seek? I am talkin about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earh worth living. Not merely peace in our time, but peace for all time.

Our problems aer man-made, therefore, they can solved by man. For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's future. And we are all mortal.
Melancthe the Woe, So-Called
melancthe at 2008-04-18 19:35 (UTC) (Link)
Yes, yes, that's all very nice, but it's not terribly helpful, is it?
ehowton
ehowton at 2008-04-18 19:37 (UTC) (Link)
Visualize Whirrled Peas.
Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2008-04-18 22:35 (UTC) (Link)
Bastard!
ehowton
ehowton at 2008-04-18 23:03 (UTC) (Link)
You, however, have expressed the opinion...
Where? Where did I express this opinion?


The fuckstick concedes.

Case closed:

ProfessorTom (5:50:57 PM): the matter is concluded
EricHowton (5:51:03 PM): The mater is NOT concluded
EricHowton (5:51:15 PM): You accused me of stating an opinion on the matter
EricHowton (5:51:26 PM): I asked where
EricHowton (5:51:31 PM): There is an open question
EricHowton (5:51:35 PM): Not a concluded matter
EricHowton (5:51:43 PM): Where exactly do YOU see concluded matter?
EricHowton (5:51:48 PM): I see open question
EricHowton (5:51:52 PM): Hop to it
EricHowton (5:51:58 PM): I ain't getting any younger
ProfessorTom (5:52:09 PM): don't hold you breath waiting
ProfessorTom (5:52:12 PM): and get another hobby


Edited at 2008-04-18 11:05 pm (UTC)
Previous Entry  Next Entry