Log in

No account? Create an account

Inheriting the Earth

Posted on 2011.09.24 at 14:10
Current Location: 67114
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Above all, know thyself. No, its not the biblical term for masturbation. I mean the apparent phenomenon that many people don't actually know themselves well enough to anticipate their own reactions to any number of random stimuli. Or worse, the same stimuli under different circumstances. Yes, I run into this on a near-daily basis. I even have a helpful reverse-idiom of sorts at the ready for times I encounter it. Its my get out of jail free card. I ask more or less, "Is my request the first of its nature?" I ask it to anyone who's job it is to perform a very specific function, yet who appear genuinely surprised * when its my turn to ask it of them.

The Judeo-Christian systems of belief would have you believe that the meek are going to inherit the earth. Not meek as its defined now, as it was. To mean gentle, yielding. As in turning oneself over to the service of the Lord and not fighting against His Will (Thy Will be done). I've sat through many a sermon agonizing over and studying the original Hebrew dialect in order to gain understanding of the word choice first used by King David in Psalms and later by Christ in Matthew. After all, who doesn't want to inherit the earth?

Unsurprisingly, I feel differently. Not that I don't want to inherit the earth - I do, but that I alone shall inherit it. At least, myself and those of my ilk. For its not the meek who will do so, rather the open-minded; those who can integrate new information into their belief system and exceed the limitations of their programming. The funny thing about close-mindedness as an ethos is that it has a way of proving itself ineffective through active rejection of newly discovered knowledge. So if the close-minded can claim that they shall inherit the earth through close-mindedness, I can certainly claim otherwise - and I have a whole lot more confidence in the unprejudiced, unbigoted, and impartial than the millions of monotheists out there who would disagree with me. Close-mindedness just seems like such a dead-end way of life despite their unsubstantiated claims to the contrary.

I personally learn through a process of doing - hands on experimentation. Succeeding and failing both. If the outcome is not as expected, I change a variable and try again. Some people give up entirely upon their first failure and see any further attempts as fruitless defeatism. Others try and try again, but miss completely the learning portion of the lesson by refusing to change any variables. In this case, I feel that I am with what I have presumed is the majority - those who persevere no matter their ideology, and that I can at least respect.

Changing, growing, can be as difficult as attempting to define something as elusive as love. Some make lists of things they do which prove love, or have ideas about another's actions which would run contrary to that list, thus disprove it - after all, we all see the world differently. Myself? I only know the depth of my feelings of affection and devotion - without lists. The moment I've written it down it runs the risk of limiting me - slowing me down from experiencing something which may greatly add to my exposure. Lists can get confining fast, and most of us aren't into limiting our expressions of love, but growing them - exceeding both the expectations of others, and expectations of self. Think Old Testament versus New Testament. In the former "works" were required for blessings, in the latter only Grace.

And speaking of sweeping theological changes, ever since Christ said so then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot I will spue thee out of my mouth, I've been walking the narrow path between two camps of hotheads everywhere I go. No matter what the subject of conversation is, NO ONE WANTS TO BE SPEWED FROM JESUS' MOUTH. They therefore run full hot, or full cold, under the assumption that one is more important than the other, never bothering to question why, and only seeking council and advice from like-minded folk which is nothing more than egotistical validation. These people are incapable of feeling shame, replacing it with pride and calling it humility. How can I combat that?

I was a teenager when my mother explained to me that I needed to get to know myself. I thought she was an idiot - I was me for goodness sake - how could I not know me? Of course I discovered what she meant during the months I spent in near-isolation the first time I left home. 5,130 miles from home to be precise. And have since learned that there are other activities in which to acquaint yourself with...yourself. The same tools used in character-building can also illuminate autognosis if you allow it, as its something which requires nurturing. And despite my own series of scenarios of how I would behave in any series of circumstances, even I'm surprised by my own emotional reactions at times. Except that by adding that knowledge to my data-set then helps me in anticipating it in future outcomes, thus strengthening my armament for dealing with whatever life throws at me. Perfect? No. Better than being continually (and more often than not negatively) surprised by life? Absolutely.

I told a young man once what my father told me when I was a young man, "The severe polarity you feel righteously about is common amongst youth. As you grow, learn, experience and mature, you'll start to question everything. And when you do, you'll find you become more moderate in your views as you discover the truth, which always lies somewhere in the middle." I explained to this young man that my father's words were true because it was just as I had experienced it, and I wanted him to experience it as well. This freedom from a lifetime of ignorance. The youth said I was stupid for being so weak to turn away from [whatever the ideological conversation was at the time].

So go forth and be meek. Or not. Run hot and cold. It doesn't matter, you're not going to inherit the earth. I am. I will outlast you. I will try and fail and learn and succeed. My dizzying array of hands-on empirical activities will trump your hibernation because I am infinitely flexible. Entropy destroys that which is unchanging - like those principles you put so much stock into - but has a difficult time feeding from that which grows and I am on a path of personal growth. I'll get mine in the end, and this is why.

* http://ehowton.livejournal.com/322402.html


(Deleted comment)
ehowton at 2011-09-25 06:21 (UTC) (Link)
I'll take that under advisement :P
CeltManX, Devlin O' Coileáin
celtmanx at 2011-09-25 05:54 (UTC) (Link)
I was in Glen Rose at the Promise tonight. They had a display out front for the Creationism museum of Glen Rose showing a supposed human foot print with a dinosaur foot print overlapping it. The caption read that amateur archeologists had discovered it in the Paluxy and that the human foot print was from the Cretaceous period. They apparently found just what they were looking for in a place known for its dinosaur foot prints not human foot prints set in limestone. It was the convenient proof they were looking for (read made themselves) that God created man and then the dinosaurs.
ehowton at 2011-09-25 06:18 (UTC) (Link)
And then man created the hibachi & had BBQ dino!
michelle1963 at 2011-09-26 01:20 (UTC) (Link)
The lengths some people will go to fool themselves...., I don't really care what people believe, but seriously, wherein their Bible does it say, "Thou may lie to convince people of the truth of my words"?
CeltManX, Devlin O' Coileáin
celtmanx at 2011-09-26 02:47 (UTC) (Link)
Them crazy Baptists will go to great lengths to prove their right. If it takes falsifying evidence and lying, not to mention a burning cross or two their all for it.
ehowton at 2011-09-26 22:38 (UTC) (Link)
My favorite are the Baptists who pretend to not be Baptists until they've lured you past the point of no return then spring it on you when its too late.
thesweetestnote at 2011-09-25 23:54 (UTC) (Link)
Transitions. I'm NOT alone! ;)
ehowton at 2011-09-26 00:06 (UTC) (Link)
I've missed you!! Even listened to "Howton's Temple of Joys" today...twice!
thesweetestnote at 2011-09-29 20:07 (UTC) (Link)
Super cool! Miss you too! Feels good to be back :D That song may need a sequel LOL ;p
ehowton at 2011-09-30 01:46 (UTC) (Link)
Speaking of, I hope you've been enjoying these:


If not - get to downloading!
thesweetestnote at 2011-10-02 00:28 (UTC) (Link)
Awesome! Very Nice ;)
michelle1963 at 2011-09-26 01:52 (UTC) (Link)
I am always fascinated when a person reaches a conclusion on a topic, and then sticks to that conclusion regardless of what new information comes along. Is it because they've reached a place of comfort and comfort is paramount over new experiences and the possible modifications to underlying opinions and beliefs? Or perhaps it's simply easier to stay the same rather than make changes?

For myself, the more experiences I've had, the more knowledge I've gained, the more difficult it has become to believe in simple yes or no, black and white answers. I've found that most subjects are rather complicated, and any answers/conclusions very situation specific.

Even my core beliefs get tweaked when I have new information.
ehowton at 2011-09-26 22:36 (UTC) (Link)
I wonder if that's simply a personality trait of ours, or if anyone could learn to do it? I mean, if normally shy people can overcome shyness through public speaking classes and self-confidence through meeting new people by doing it over and over until they're comfortable, then surely close-minded people can learn to accept new information and just as slowly start to digest and apply it as they experience how magnificent their life becomes in doing so? Surely.
michelle1963 at 2011-09-27 02:24 (UTC) (Link)
I'm sure that the make-up of our personality makes it easier for us to take in new information and adjust than others. In other words, we're naturals.

In regard to you example about shy people overcoming shyness through public speaking, etc., I agree, people can learn new skills that may indeed go against their natural tendencies, but they must have motivation to do so. Shy people often find that trait limiting and are motivated to change it. Do close-minded people ever find their close-mindedness inconvenient enough to try to and change?
ehowton at 2011-09-27 02:54 (UTC) (Link)
Do close-minded people ever find their close-mindedness inconvenient enough to try to and change?

I cannot believe that those types of people are incapable of understanding that the level of frustration they must experience every single day are caused by their own inability to process new information. I simply cannot. dentin however answered "No" and backed it up really well. In short, if it doesn't fit their reality-map, they honest-to-God believe the entire world is wrong, and they alone are right.

When I was younger I used to wish stupidity hurt.

Now I know it does because I've seen their incredulity.

And it makes me sad.
(Deleted comment)
ehowton at 2011-09-26 22:28 (UTC) (Link)

Remember this instructional video I made after you mentioned it??? http://ehowton.livejournal.com/310955.html

Hell, I call you out on the first line. You said it should be nominated for a Grammy :P

336 views on YouTube.
jobu121 at 2011-09-30 01:44 (UTC) (Link)
Yes, although I wish not to dive into a debate of theology on a blog, I must state that you are correct. Meek in those days did not mean weak.

In addition, David was a very powerful strong leader who probably was warring his whole life. It was the lifestyle to which he was accustom. And many of us could not comprehend the magnitude of a siege of those day. YEARS!!!

As you I had too wondered if I would inherit the entire earth. But I believe it is a metaphor for that the ruling class of the day - Rome - would one day fall and those who believed in the Lord will inherit the earth over the corruption of tyranny... Hmmm, corruption of tyranny, hence the reason many scholars believe that we the United States is the present-day Rome.

Well, I will hop down from my small soap box now. Sorry just adding me two cents for what it's worth.

Cheers my friend, I hope all is well in your world er earth.
ehowton at 2011-09-30 01:47 (UTC) (Link)
Not at all! I enjoy points of view I myself have not always considered, or am ignorant of.
jobu121 at 2011-09-30 02:16 (UTC) (Link)
I do as well, sometimes the points of view that are not mine may be simply the fact of looking at the same flower and seeing separate things. I never nor will discredit anyone's perspective or view points. We all come from backgrounds of diversity and have different life experiences that make us who we are.
ehowton at 2011-09-30 03:05 (UTC) (Link)
I recently discovered that some of my "opinions" were only societal regurgitation - I had never before actively considered some topics, and upon examination and processing, found myself completely opposite of what I thought I thought simply because I'd never considered it before! How fascinating is that?

I like your analogy of seeing separate things.
Previous Entry  Next Entry