ehowton (ehowton) wrote,

What We Think Doesn't Alter Anything

I read a piece awhile back which polled an exhaustive number of people and discovered that the majority of us believe we are above-average. Average of course being the mathematical mean; that which is neither in the majority nor minority. Ergo, were most of us truly above-average, that would be the average, and we would not be above it. If we then think we're above that average, and most of us do - then we've just raised the average again because of our numbers. Its a mathematical impossibility for most of us to be so. If where we think we are keeps adjusting where we actually are, nothing changes. What we think doesn't alter anything.

Which is why opinions fascinate me - they mean almost nothing. Our opinions are insignificant. The past decade I've been highly amused at those overly-simplistic polls on websites and news channels. The Yes/No option and then results of other's Yes/No option. Those don't actually change anything in the real world - its a collection and display of meaningless data. Most of them start with, "Do you think..." and then present a logical fallacy. In essence, by clicking either radio button you've already answered the question of whether you think or not by "answering" a logical fallacy despite what the remainder of the question may be; e.g. Do you think Charlie Sheen's recent antics will hurt his career? What you think is irrelevant. What those who disagree with you think is also irreverent. Both answers are irrelevant. You see, even if you're in the majority of your poll, what you think doesn't alter anything.

suzanne1945 sent me this girls-gone-wild video-gone-viral on wealth distribution which amused me greatly - not from anything real, but because of my perceived reaction from those who have opinions about political parties. Based on my limited exposure to most people who speak intelligently about politics from an armchair-quarterback perspective, I assume each defender of their favorite party is going to accuse the opposite party - and both sides will have really good reasons. Arguing about politics doesn't seem to be the solution to wealth distribution, but we're going to continue to believe it does, and continue to argue about it. You see, the majority of us believe its the other party's fault (Who supports a party they disagree with?). And we're back to mathematics about opinions. The same opinions which got us into this mess, and the same opinions which will keep us here. We're only human after all, and what we think doesn't alter anything.
Tags: philosophy

  • A Plague For All Seasons

    Vainly valuing endless inefficacious toil seeds seemingly insatiable ennui Lifetimes of vague frustrations passed down from generation to generation…

  • NVMe on ESXi

    I am running ESXi 6.7u3 on an old PowerEdge R610 and recently purchased a no-name NVMe m.2 drive and the M2 PCIe SSD Adapter from…

  • Twin Lens Reflex

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.