?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Eric

V for Vendetta

Posted on 2006.08.12 at 00:01

Comments:


Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2006-08-13 21:34 (UTC) (Link)
granted. I will agree to disagree.
ehowton
ehowton at 2006-08-13 21:45 (UTC) (Link)
Now you've lost me. To what are you disagreeing to, exactly, since the subject was whether or not you felt you could be persuaded to perform oral sex on another male?
Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2006-08-13 21:47 (UTC) (Link)
I was disagreeeing to your claim that I couldn't persuade you to see the film, World Trade Center
ehowton
ehowton at 2006-08-13 21:50 (UTC) (Link)
By that same token, you're admitting that if my argument were strong enough, I could persuade you to suck dick! Fantastic! I look forward to your review!
Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2006-08-13 21:53 (UTC) (Link)
that's not quite the case. See the recently posted comment. No, you could not persuade me to suck dick.
ehowton
ehowton at 2006-08-13 21:58 (UTC) (Link)
Accordingly, then, you could not persuade me to see WTC.
Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2006-08-13 21:59 (UTC) (Link)
That's still up for grabs.
ehowton
ehowton at 2006-08-13 22:02 (UTC) (Link)
This is pointless Tom. Based on my argument, with your conviction to not place penis in your mouth, my convictions about watching Oliver Stone films is equally as solid. You can't have it both ways.

Regardless, I will enjoy reading your review and thoughts on the subject matter at hand.
Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2006-08-13 22:04 (UTC) (Link)
ergo, I agree to disagree and await your comments on my review...as soon as it's posted.
ehowton
ehowton at 2006-08-13 22:57 (UTC) (Link)
For the love of christ stop saying that! At this point, you cannot say 'you agree to disagree' unless you're willing to munch cock...*sigh*
Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2006-08-14 07:20 (UTC) (Link)
no. If I agree to munch cock, then I'm agreeing with you. However, I agree to disagree with your assertion that you cannot be persuaded. Being persuaded to watch a movie has a lot less involved for a male homosapien then does sucking the cock of another male homosapien. Keep your facts straight.
ehowton
ehowton at 2006-08-14 14:10 (UTC) (Link)
The strength behind the conviction, however, is the same. There's no 'facts' to this argument, just conviction. And now that you've made it quite clear to me that you think I can be persuaded, I'm pretty sure that tells me a lot about your character to the point where I might actually be able to convince you to perform fellatio.

I can't wait to read your review.
Tomas Gallucci
schpydurx at 2006-08-14 17:42 (UTC) (Link)
apples and oranges.
ehowton
ehowton at 2006-08-14 20:07 (UTC) (Link)
Ok, check this out. In High School, this guy asked me why I didn't eat pork. I asked him, "If I could prove to you that God himself said, "Do not eat pork." Would you stop eating it? He said yes. I showed him the scripture in the old testament where God forbade it. He was blown away. He said he was never going to eat pork again. Then I showed him the scripture that forbade the eating of shellfish. I asked him if he was going to stop eating shellfish. "No," he said, "Because shrimp tastes too good."

*eyeroll*

You're arguing against the same type of dumb logic, where you think the rules apply to one situation, and not the other, because the variables are different.
Renegade
leonardii at 2006-08-14 09:27 (UTC) (Link)
Ah, never mind my previous post.

You just said the word I was looking for.
Previous Entry  Next Entry